What is LWCF — and how can Tribes access it?
A foundational orientation to the Land and Water Conservation Fund: how the program is structured, what funding pathways exist, and what's recently changed for Tribal Governments.
LWCF is the federal government's flagship conservation fund — capitalized by offshore energy royalties, distributed largely through states, and historically structured in ways that have kept Tribal Governments at the margins.
What is the Land and Water Conservation Fund?
The Land and Water Conservation Fund — commonly called LWCF — is one of the federal government's primary tools for funding conservation and outdoor recreation across the country. Created by Congress in 1964 and permanently funded in 2020, LWCF currently receives $900 million annually from offshore oil and gas royalties. Not a dollar of that comes from general tax revenue. Of the $900 million, at least 40 percent must be used for federal purposes and at least 40 percent for financial assistance to states; how the remaining funds are allocated each year flows from the federal budget process. (For more detail on how funds are allocated annually, see the Beyond LWCF section.)
LWCF funds ten distinct programs that together support both federal land acquisition and grants to states. These include major federal land acquisition programs (BLM, NPS, USFWS, USFS), the Stateside Formula grant program, and several specialized programs. Together, these programs fund everything from neighborhood park development to large-scale land acquisition for conservation. Tribal Governments can collaborate with federal agencies to support land acquisition projects, even where they are not direct grant applicants.
Tribal Governments have an interest in LWCF that is older than the program itself — the lands this fund supports conserving are, in many cases, traditional homelands. Tribal Governments were not at the table when the program was created in 1964, and the structure that emerged has historically made it difficult for Tribal Governments to access these resources directly. That structure is now beginning to change, and this Hub exists to help Tribal Governments navigate what's available today and what's coming.
How the $900M is allocated
Tribal Governments have an interest in LWCF that is older than the program itself — the lands this fund supports conserving are, in many cases, traditional homelands. Tribal Governments were not at the table when the program was created in 1964, and the structure that emerged has historically made it difficult for Tribal Governments to access these resources directly. That structure is now beginning to change, and this Hub exists to help Tribal Governments navigate what's available today and what's coming.
Tribal Governments and LWCF: A Changing Landscape
Recent legislative changes are opening pathways that did not exist before. The EXPLORE Act of December 2024 codified the Outdoor Recreation Legacy Partnership Program (ORLP) and expanded access for Indigenous communities, including federally recognized Tribes, Alaska Native corporations, and Native Hawaiian community organizations, regardless of population size. New Mexico became the first state to remove matching fund requirements for Tribal LWCF applicants. A proposed Bureau of Indian Affairs Tribal LWCF Land Acquisition Program would create direct access without state intermediaries. The landscape is shifting in ways that matter for Tribal Governments planning their conservation and recreation work.
distributed in total through the LWCF State and Local Assistance Program.
≈ 0.1% of all funding · 0.2% of all grants awarded over 54 years.
That said, the historical picture provides important context. Between 1965 and 2019, the LWCF State and Local Assistance Program distributed approximately $4.5 billion in grants. Tribal Governments received roughly $4 million of that total — about 0.1 percent of all funding, and 0.2 percent of all grants awarded. Research conducted by Anthropological Research LLC for The Wilderness Society and NATHPO documented that Tribal staff interviewed for the study had significant interest in LWCF funding, but most had never heard of the program and none had direct experience applying for it. The barriers are structural, not aspirational.
The same research documented six structural barriers that explain the gap:
- The requirement that Tribal Governments apply through state governments rather than directly to the federal government, which many Tribal leaders describe as undermining the federal government-to-government relationship;
- Public access mandates that conflict with cultural privacy needs and treaty rights;
- A 50 percent non-federal matching requirement that most Tribal budgets cannot absorb;
- Every federal dollar must be matched with a non-federal dollar — federal funds from other agencies generally cannot count toward match.
- In-kind contributions can count in many cases: staff time, volunteer hours, donated materials, and the value of donated land or easements.
- Specific match rules and what qualifies vary by state and by project; confirm with your state LWCF liaison before building a budget.
- Limited staff capacity to manage the application and reporting process;
- The inability to apply directly to the majority of LWCF programs; and
- Complex, often strained histories with state and federal agency partners.
This Hub exists to help Tribal Governments navigate the programs that are available, prepare for the ones that may open, and connect with technical assistance that reduces the burden of doing this work alone.
Funding pathways
LWCF flows into four major pathways. Each has different rules, eligible applicants, and administering agencies. The diagram orients; the eligibility table that follows provides program-by- program detail.
Which LWCF programs are available to Tribal Governments?
Of the ten programs funded by LWCF, Tribal Governments are listed as eligible applicants for three. Several others offer indirect pathways — as sub-recipients, supporting partners, or through government-to-government consultation. The table below summarizes the landscape.
| Program | Agency | Tribal direct eligibility | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| State & Local Assistance (Stateside Formula) | NPS | Yes — through state | Must apply via state LWCF liaison; 50% non-federal match required. |
| Outdoor Recreation Legacy Partnership (ORLP) | NPS | Yes — direct (post-EXPLORE Act) | Currently paused by NPS pending program review. Direct Tribal eligibility — including Alaska Native corporations and Native Hawaiian community organizations — is permanent when the program reopens. |
| Battlefield Interpretation Grant | NPS | Yes — limited | Narrow eligibility; only a small number of Tribes have trust lands within defined battlefield boundaries. |
| Battlefield Restoration Grant | NPS | Yes — limited | Requires prior Battlefield Land Acquisition grant; very limited Tribal applicability. |
| Battlefield Land Acquisition Grant (BLAG) | NPS | No — state/local only | Tribes may participate by partnering with eligible government applicants. |
| Forest Legacy Program | USDA-USFS | No — state is applicant | Tribes can serve as supporting partners or MOU signatories to permanently protect forested properties through conservation easements or direct acquisition. |
| Cooperative Endangered Species Conservation Fund — Recovery Land Acquisition | USFWS | No — state is applicant | Minimum 25% non-federal cost share (10% for multi-state applications). Tribes must partner with States or Territories on grant applications. |
| Cooperative Endangered Species Conservation Fund — Habitat Conservation Plan Land Acquisition | USFWS | No — state is applicant | Same partnership pathway as Recovery Land Acquisition. |
| Highlands Conservation Act Program | USFWS | No | CT, NY, NJ, PA only. |
This table reflects program eligibility as of 2026. The Readiness and Recreation Initiative (RARI), an additional NPS-administered LWCF program for military-adjacent communities, is not included given its limited applicability for most Tribal Governments.
The LWCF Manual
The National Park Service maintains the LWCF State and Local Assistance Programs Manual as the operating reference for the program. The manual is designed to guide you through the administrative procedures and statutory and regulatory requirements for Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) State and Local Assistance Programs. Whether you are applying for funding or administering a state program, this is your key reference for administration, financial management, and stewardship responsibilities.
Read or download the current LWCF ManualBattlefield Land Acquisition Grants
The Battlefield Land Acquisition Grants provide for the preservation and conservation of sites of armed conflict in perpetuity. Land to be protected must be within the established battlefield survey areas. Survey areas can be reviewed using the web app linked through the National Park Service land acquisition grant page.
Learn more about Battlefield Land Acquisition GrantsThe main pathway: State and Local Assistance
The Stateside Formula program has been the most active LWCF funding pathway for Tribal Governments to date. It supports both acquisition and development projects — purchasing land for outdoor recreation, or building facilities and infrastructure on existing land — as long as the funded area remains open to public access in perpetuity. The public access requirement has more nuance than the headline suggests; LWCF funds support a range of facilities including restrooms, sports field lighting, outdoor classrooms, and similar infrastructure, and there is a conversion process that allows grantees to adjust uses under defined circumstances. We address some of these nuances in the FAQ below.
Here's how it works in practice:
Development projects — parks, trails, recreational facilities, cultural gathering spaces open to public access — and acquisition projects, including purchasing land or easements for outdoor recreation. The program provides up to 50 percent reimbursement, meaning the Tribal Government must match every federal dollar with non-federal funds. In-kind contributions can count toward match in many cases — staff time, volunteer hours, donated materials, and the value of donated land or easements. Specific rules vary by state and by project; see the Matching Funds & Financing section for guidance.
Lands acquired or developed with LWCF funds must remain open to the public for outdoor recreation in perpetuity. This requirement has been a significant barrier for Tribal Governments pursuing land acquisition for cultural, ceremonial, or treaty-rights purposes where public access conflicts with those uses. It is worth discussing this requirement openly with your state LWCF liaison before investing in an application.
For information on matching fund requirements and alternatives, see the Matching Funds & Financing section. For help navigating the state liaison relationship, see the Application Tools section.
Indirect pathways worth knowing
Even for programs where Tribal Governments are not direct applicants, there are sometimes indirect pathways worth understanding:
For the Recovery Land Acquisition Program and Habitat Conservation Plan Land Acquisition Program, a Tribal Government may participate as a sub-recipient if it holds a cooperative agreement with a state agency on conservation efforts. This requires an existing state relationship and involves the sovereignty trade-offs described above — but it can unlock funding for land acquisition that supports species recovery in Tribal territories.
The Forest Legacy Program supports acquisition of forested land to prevent conversion to non-forest uses. States are the only eligible applicants, but Tribal Governments can participate as supporting partners and may enter MOUs defining their role in project implementation and long-term management. Several Tribal Governments have used this pathway to protect forested lands within their traditional territories.
Tribal Governments cannot receive funding through the Federal Land Acquisition program, but federal agencies do consult and collaborate with Tribes on acquisition of culturally significant lands. This is an area where relationships with NPS, USFWS, and USFS land staff matter — documented Tribal support for a federal acquisition can shape which lands get prioritized.
What changed: the EXPLORE Act and ORLP
The bipartisan EXPLORE Act, signed into law in December 2024, included provisions that significantly expand Tribal access to one LWCF program: the Outdoor Recreation Legacy Partnership Program (ORLP).
What ORLP is: ORLP is a competitive grant program administered by NPS that focuses on outdoor recreation in economically disadvantaged communities. Unlike the Stateside Formula, ORLP allows Tribal Governments to apply as direct recipients.
What changed under the EXPLORE Act: Before the EXPLORE Act, ORLP eligibility was tied to population thresholds that excluded most Tribal communities. The EXPLORE Act permanently authorizes the Outdoor Recreation Legacy Partnership Program, a nationally competitive LWCF-funded grant program focused on parks and outdoor recreation in underserved urban communities. ORLP now explicitly includes Indigenous communities as eligible applicants alongside states and local governments, expanding opportunities for Tribes and other Native entities in urban areas once the program reopens. This is a meaningful structural change.
The EXPLORE Act’s changes to ORLP are permanent, but applications are paused until the National Park Service reopens the program. As of early 2026, NPS has halted ORLP applications while the program is reviewed to align with the current administration's goals. No reopening date has been announced. When ORLP is operating again, federally recognized Tribes and Alaska Native corporations are expected to be able to apply as eligible applicants under the program’s guidance, while urban Indian organizations and Native Hawaiian community organizations will generally participate as partners or subrecipients on projects led by eligible applicants.
Historically, NPS has run ORLP application periods in June and November; we will update this section if NPS confirms timing for the next cycle.
Key terminology
consultation correspondences NPS conducted with Tribal Governments regarding Stateside projects — a government-to-government responsibility of NPS, not the state, under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act.
Frequently asked questions
The legislation behind LWCF
LWCF was established in 1965 and permanently reauthorized and fully funded through the Great American Outdoors Act in 2020. The EXPLORE Act (2024) opened ORLP eligibility directly to Tribal Governments.
- 1964LWCF Act signed
Congress creates the Land and Water Conservation Fund. Tribal Governments are not at the table.
- 2020Great American Outdoors Act
LWCF receives permanent, full mandatory funding of $900M annually.
- Dec 2024EXPLORE Act
Direct ORLP eligibility extended to all federally recognized Tribes, Alaska Native corporations, and Native Hawaiian community organizations — regardless of population.
- 2024New Mexico S.B. 169
First state law removing matching-fund requirements for Tribal LWCF applicants.
Read the source documents
Where to go from here
If you're new to LWCF and trying to figure out where your Tribal Government stands, the first step is internal: check whether your government has a current recreation, tourism, or conservation strategic plan that has been formally adopted. If you do, that plan is your foundation. If you don't, considering the development of one — even a brief one — can strengthen future applications and clarify Tribal priorities.
Introduce your government and its conservation and recreation priorities. Ask about the SCORP process and whether there are upcoming application cycles. The letter of intent template in the Application Tools section can help structure that first communication.
TPL has a formal agreement with NPS to provide direct technical assistance to Tribal Governments developing applications for the Outdoor Recreation Legacy Partnership (ORLP) program. For more information, please check out TPL's website:
Visit TPL's ORLP resourceCouncils of Governments often have technical assistance capacity and are involved in long-range planning related to outdoor recreation and conservation in your region. They can be useful partners in scoping projects and identifying match.
The policy landscape is shifting. ORLP's reopening, federal appropriations decisions, and state-level reforms will affect what's available and when. We monitor these developments and update this Hub accordingly.
The Application Tools section includes a plain-language overview of the general LWCF Stateside application process — from SCORP engagement through post-award reporting — designed for Tribal staff who are early in the planning process.
Ready for the next step?
Move from understanding to action with template letters, resolution language, and plain-language application overviews.
Open Tools & Templates